- Some blocks in gated communities listed under prohibited list
- Flat owners are worried about technical problems
- Why a technical problem surface for a property registered 15 years ago
- Developers have tough time obtaining NALA conversion
- The officials are searching to trace the survey numbers that have gone missing from Dharani portal
- People appeal to CM KCR for his intervention
Hyderabad: The Dharani portal, having troubled the farmers, is also not leaving the house owners. They find the portal a real hell for them. They are worried about how to solve their problems by consulting them.
Because of the inordinate delay in obtaining NALA conversion, the developers are very much worried about launching new projects. They have been doing several rounds to Collectorates, but in vain.
The people are angry over the survey numbers that have escaped the attention of the Dharani portal. The officials are not able to find these survey numbers elsewhere. The people have been appealing to Chief Minister K Chandrasekhar Rao for his intervention in tracing the missing survey numbers in the portal. The following are some of the examples of how the Dharani portal gave trouble to people:
A doctor purchased a flat in Miyapur in a project that was launched 16 years ago. He has been living in the flat for the past 12 years. Recently, he put his flat for sale on the market as he decided to relocate to his new flat in Kokapet. He received an advance within a week of putting up the flat on the market from a prospective buyer. He wanted to go for registration of the flat in favour of the buyer.
He was shocked to find that the survey number of the land on which his flat was built was included under the prohibited list. As he was a doctor, he verified all aspects before purchasing the Miyapur flat. He was worried over why the new problem cropped up now. Why did authorities list the survey number of the land on which his flat has been built under the prohibited list of survey numbers?The builder disposed of the flat a decade ago. The land owner is difficult to trace as his whereabouts are not known. Therefore, he consulted a lawyer.
The Telangana Government has announced plans to locate a Plastics Park at Sultanpur near Patancheru. As a result, the demand for land in and around Sultanpur has increased. A developer has decided to build an apartment complex in the area. He reached an agreement with a farmer to buy land. He also paid the advance. He applied to authorities for Nala conversion of the land and was hoping to get the conversion done in a week. But, it did not materialise even after six months. The employees of the construction firm are making rounds daily to the Collectorate to get the work done.
Nagarjuna Reddy owned 40 acres in Nalgonda. He has records for the same – Pattadar Passbooks. But the newly issued passbook showed that he only owned 26 acres. When they sought the reason, the officials say that survey numbers of the rest of the 14 acres have gone missing. God knows how the survey numbers went missing. The Dharani software has no facility to include the missing survey numbers.
When the MRO was approached for a solution on what the farmers should do under these circumstances, the MRO passed the buck to the District Collector. When a complaint is lodged with the collector, he is advising the farmer to exercise the option online. There is no information about missing survey numbers even after one year of applying to the Collector. The concerned land owners should search for the missing survey numbers. The farmers are at a loss of comprehension on how to go about it.
The Dharani portal is giving trouble not only to farmers, but also to real estate developers and house owners. Survey numbers of land on which major gated community projects developed about 10 or 15 years ago have been included under the list of prohibited survey numbers. As a result, the flat owners are finding it difficult to sell their flat. In fact, if the developers comply with all rules and regulations, permission will be granted to major gated community projects. The flat owners who purchased property in these gated communities are questioning the rationale behind the authorities including some of the blocks in the list of prohibited survey numbers.
The house owners question how authorities granted permission for construction of apartments in gated communities if there is a problem with a specific survey number. The flat owners argue that they would not have purchased the flat at all, had the authorities denied permission to the project then on technical grounds. They appeal to the government to comprehend the severity of the problem and resolve it in case there is a lapse on the part of government officials and servants.
